??????????????????????????????????????????????????????6???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????76????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Google News????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Google??????????????????????????????Google News??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????2002?????????????????????????????????????????????The Sun Sentinel???????????????Chicago Tribune?????????????????????????????????????????????Google News?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Google?????????????????????????????????????????????9???7?????????1?????????The Sun Sentinel???????????????2002????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????6??????????????????"Popular StoriesBusiness: Most Viewed"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Googlebot???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Google News???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Tribune????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1?????????????????????????????????????????????1:00:34????????????????????????????????????????????????URL???????????????????????????URL???Googlebot???9???2??????3??????????????????????????????????????????9???7?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Google????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????$1 billion???1000???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????            The article, headlined "United Airlines Files for Bankruptcy," wasoriginally published in the Chicago Tribune in 2002, and appeared on thenewspaper's website.  It then became part of the online database of Tribune'snewspapers.  Our records indicate that the Googlebot crawled this story asrecently as September 2 and September 3 and apparently treated it as old news.                                On September 7, 2008 at 1:00:34 ET, (Sept. 6, 2008, 10:00:34 PT) ourrecords indicate that the article received a single visit.  Given the factthat it was the middle of the night, traffic to the business section of theSun Sentinel site was very low at the time.  We believe that this single visitresulted in a link to the old article being created on a dynamic portion ofthe Sun Sentinel's business section under a tab called "Popular StoriesBusiness: Most Viewed."                                Again, no new story was published and the old story was not re-published-alink to the old story was merely created.  The URL for the old story did notchange when the link appeared.                                On September 7, at 1:36:03 ET (Sept. 6, 10:36:03) a user of the SunSentinel's website, viewing a story about airline policies regarding cancelledflights, clicked on the link to the old story under the "Popular StoriesBusiness: Most Viewed" tab.  Fifty-two seconds later, at 1:36:57 ET (10:36:57PT), Googlebot visited the Sun Sentinel's website again and crawled the story.                                This time, despite the fact that the URL to the old story hadn't changed,despite the fact that Googlebot had seen this story previously, it wasapparently treated as though it was breaking news.  Shortly thereafter, Googleprovided a link to the old story on Google News and dated it September 6,2008.  Google's dating the story on Google News made it appear current toGoogle News users.       

投稿者： On Off and Beyond 投稿日時： 2008年9月10日(水) 19:58